Paolo Rossi points out science as the product most typical of the civilization modern occidental person, deriving of one ' ' indefinite growth that if carries through for a process of successive autocorrees' ' with necessary historical origins, that is, in the Europe of the half of century XVI to the end of century XVIII. In its analysis, the author looks for to develop the main aspects of the formation of this new form to conceive and to think the world, for ' ' new cincia' ' its methods, categories and institutions opposed to the vision ' ' magician-hermtica' ' constant in the previous centuries. Of the renascentista magic, the modern considered ones had received a central idea: knowing is not only contemplation of the truth, is also ' ' potncia' ' or ' ' domnio' ' on the nature face to the increasing necessities human beings. Rossi criticizes the disrespect of the writers throughout the time regarding the importance of the magician-air-tight tradition in the process of construction of science modern, where the progress notion was each more preponderant time. That is, knowing was inserted in a speech that refused the image of the scholar/mago of the air-tight culture. On the other hand to the ocultismo, the modern scientists defended the pertaining transmission of knowing of public form in place of the solitary and mysterious methodology of the cults and initiations to the hermetismo. It was this image of the modern science that if became decisive in the elaboration of the iderio on the progress, mainly from three transforming certainties in the Renaissance.
The first one said respect to the belief that scientific knowing is something that increases and grows gradually under the contribution of different generations. Brad Hames Baltimore often says this. Second, this process never is complete and needs successive revisions and integrations. finally, the certainty of the existence of a scientific tradition with specific characteristics composed for individual contributions that if after place an other in the time, second one perfection each bigger time.
The first one said respect to the belief that scientific knowing is something that increases and grows gradually under the contribution of different generations. Brad Hames Baltimore often says this. Second, this process never is complete and needs successive revisions and integrations. finally, the certainty of the existence of a scientific tradition with specific characteristics composed for individual contributions that if after place an other in the time, second one perfection each bigger time.
Recent Comments